Government of Canada (2005) – “Guidance on Controlling Corrosion in Drinking Water Distribution Systems” – Any treatment change that will have a chemical, biological or physical impact on the distributed water should be carefully monitored in the distribution system. Lead corrosion and lead levels are easily influenced by small changes in the quality of the water distributed. Water with pH significantly under 7.5 is strongly correlated with higher lead levels at the tap. A pH exceeding 9.5 can lead to an increase in lead solubility. Effects of fluoridation chemicals not analyzed.
Water Research (2013) – “Impact of treatment on lead released from full and partially replaced lead service lines” – Orthophosphate reduces lead release from undisturbed lead service lines by 64%. For lead service lines partially replaced with copper, lead concentrations were unchanged by phosphate dosing at moderate flow (103 ± 265 vs 169 ± 349 μg/L) and were increased to very high levels when sampled at high flow rates (1001 ± 1808 vs 257 ± 224 μg/L). Effects of fluoridation chemicals not analyzed.
Web Editor Analysis: Flint’s tap water, currently from Detroit, needs higher lead concentration reductions than orthophosphate provides, even with ideal water chemistry. The Safe Water Drinking Act’s target range for water chemistry (see Page 2-6), doesn’t maximize the typical corrosion control chemicals’ effectiveness. Orthophosphate’s effective range occurs with water pH above 7.5, but far lower pH ranges are allowed under the Safe Water Drinking Act and Detroit Water and Sewerage Department’s “goals”. Even with ideal chemistry, orthophosphate is only 70% effective at reducing lead leaching from standard brass plumbing components. Flint’s water needs even larger lead concentration reductions.
The Frederick Post (Maryland, 2/2/94) – “Lead levels in Thurmont water drop” – After halting hydrafluorosilic acid fluoridation in 1992, tap water lead levels dropped from 50 times the EPA limit to acceptable levels.
Tacoma Public Utilities (12/2/92) – “Memorandum” – Tap water lead level plummets after suspending fluoridation.
News & Observer (North Carolina 5/18/05) – “Water treatment process called potential risk” – A combination of chloramines and fluorosilicic acid, especially with extra amounts of ammonia, increases lead leaching… About 300 customers had water tested after notice of the lead was issued in November, and levels were high in 25 percent of the houses.
Environmental Health Perspectives (2007) – “Chloramine Catch: Water Disinfectant Can Raise Lead Exposure” Children’s blood lead levels increase in Wayne County, North Carolina, after switching from chlorine to chloramine for disinfection. Need to test full range of water treatment chemicals, including fluoride, to quantify their effects on leaching lead.
Journal of the American Water Works Association (2010) – “Lead-contaminated water from brass plumbing devices in new buildings” – New buildings at University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill water had lead concentrations up to 100 μg/L. Chapel Hill’s water is treated with phosphates for corrosion control, chloramine for disinfection, and hydrofluosilicic acid for community-wide dental protection.
Journal of the American Water Works Association (2005) – “Lead leaching from inline brass devices: A critical evaluation of the existing standard” – A carefully controlled orthophosphate solution can significantly reduce lead leaching from brass into tap water, but significantly increases copper leaching into the tap water. Leaching effects of fluoridation chemicals were not tested.
Medical News Today (2005 Press Release) – “Fluoride Chemicals Leach Lead Into Water Supplies” – The combination of chloramines and fluorosilicic acid causes a 3 to 4-fold increase in the amount of lead that leaches into water.